LEINER HEALTH PRODUCTS INC
CIK 1043055Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Aug 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Covington & Burling | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carol Anne HuffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- David A. BrittenhamDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carol Anne HuffKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| David A. BrittenhamDebevoise & Plimpton | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.62 | 1.51 | 0.62 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.27 |