BAUSCH & LOMB INC BOL (last ticker on record)
CIK 10427Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Nixon Peabody | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Deborah J. McLeanNixon PeabodyFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.05×
- Deborah McLean QuinnNixon PeabodyFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Deborah J. McLeanNixon Peabody | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 3.05 |
| Deborah McLean QuinnNixon Peabody | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 3.79 |