VIGNETTE CORP VIGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1042185Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine L. DawsonGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David W. FergusonFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- ANTHONY M. ALLENGunderson DettmerFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 2.96×
- Brian K. BeardGunderson DettmerFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Jay K. HachigianGunderson DettmerFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine L. DawsonGunderson Dettmer | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David W. Ferguson | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.49 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| ANTHONY M. ALLENGunderson Dettmer | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.45 | 3.10 | 2.96 |
| Brian K. BeardGunderson Dettmer | Sep 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Jay K. HachigianGunderson Dettmer | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.68 |