ITC DELTACOM INC ITCD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1041954Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Feb 2004 to Nov 2008
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Dinse Knapp & McAndrewFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Hinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Maynard Cooper & GaleFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Verrill DanaFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jul 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Dinse Knapp & McAndrew | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Hinckley Allen & Snyder | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 62 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.51 |
| K&L Gates | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Maynard Cooper & Gale | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 43 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Verrill Dana | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 24 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Edwards & Angell | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David M. CarterHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Charles E. SievingHogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Richard J. ParrinoHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kevin K. GreensladeHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark P. TanouryCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David M. CarterHunton & Williams | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Charles E. SievingHogan & Hartson | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| Richard J. ParrinoHogan & Hartson | Jul 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Kevin K. GreensladeHogan Lovells US LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 21 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark P. TanouryCooley LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 36 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 1.20 |