RIT TECHNOLOGIES LTD RITT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1041844Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Pearl CohenFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Pearl Cohen | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 44 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Mark SelingerMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Mark SelingerMcDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.98 |