URBAN ONE, INC. UONEK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1041657Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Buchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Clark HillFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Dykema GossettFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wiley ReinFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Spahr | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Covington & Burling | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 123 | 1.14 | 0.73 | 1.47 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Clark Hill | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 51 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Dykema Gossett | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 115 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
| Wiley Rein | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 38 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 1.15 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David H. EngvallCovington & BurlingFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Ronald BassoBuchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James J. BarnesReed SmithFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- F. Mark ReuterKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Catherine J. DarganCovington & BurlingFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David H. EngvallCovington & Burling | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Ronald BassoBuchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James J. BarnesReed Smith | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| F. Mark ReuterKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 14 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Catherine J. DarganCovington & Burling | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 |