ATMI INC ATMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1041577Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shipman & GoodwinFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Shipman & Goodwin | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.25 | 0.82 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig E. MarcusRopes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Michael GrundeiWiggin and DanaFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Scott S. RosenblumKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Donna L. BrooksShipman & GoodwinFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig E. MarcusRopes & Gray | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Michael GrundeiWiggin and Dana | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Scott S. RosenblumKramer Levin Naftalis | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 1.40 |
| Donna L. BrooksShipman & Goodwin | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |