LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC LSAK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1041514Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Schneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Steven I. WeinbergerFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Schulte LLP | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| DLA Piper | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Schneider Weinberger LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.59 | 2.20 | 1.44 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Davis Polk | May 2005 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Piper Rudnick | May 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Steven I. Weinberger | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 49 | 1.10 | 1.85 | 1.51 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA PiperFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- James M. SchneiderSchneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- John W. CarrShapiro Buchman ProvineFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- DOUGLAS A. CIFUPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Steven I. WeinbergerSchneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & Emery | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Jun 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA Piper | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| James M. SchneiderSchneider Weinberger LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.69 | 2.51 | 1.47 |
| John W. CarrShapiro Buchman Provine | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| DOUGLAS A. CIFUPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 26 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Steven I. WeinbergerSchneider Weinberger LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 47 | 1.33 | 1.75 | 1.32 |