DITECH HOLDING Corp DHCP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1040719Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Nov 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2018 to Dec 2018
- Law firms
- 19
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Fennemore CraigFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Carlton FieldsFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 197 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.10× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Morse Barnes-Brown & PendletonFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Polsinelli PCFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 82 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Ulmer & BerneFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Fennemore Craig | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.10 |
| Reed Smith | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Carlton Fields | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.34 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Venable LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 197 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.61 |
| Piper Rudnick | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Morse Barnes-Brown & Pendleton | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.63 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Porter & Hedges | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Willkie Farr | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Polsinelli PC | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 82 | 1.22 | 0.81 | 1.36 |
| Ulmer & Berne | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 34 | 1.22 | 0.49 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Frank R. AdamsWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Richard A. DenmonCarlton FieldsFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Peter J. GordonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- David E. WeissDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Rosalind Fahey KruseSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank R. AdamsWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.75 | 1.41 | 1.00 |
| Richard A. DenmonCarlton Fields | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Peter J. GordonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.68 |
| David E. WeissDLA Piper | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Rosalind Fahey KruseSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 5 | 2.01 | 0.00 | 2.74 |