GeoEye, Inc. GEOY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1040570Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Jones DayFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Jones Day | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Marie L. GibsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Nancy A. LiebermanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- William P. O NeillLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie L. GibsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 16 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Nancy A. LiebermanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| William P. O NeillLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.51 | 1.61 | 1.26 |