INSPIRE PHARMACEUTICALS INC ISPH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1040416Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fried FrankFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fried Frank | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Willkie Farr | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Reed Smith | Feb 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David N. ShineFried FrankFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Adam M. TurteltaubWillkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Russell L. LeafWillkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Edward BromleyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward P. Bromley IIIReed SmithFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David N. ShineFried Frank | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Adam M. TurteltaubWillkie Farr | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Russell L. LeafWillkie Farr | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Edward BromleyKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 3.96 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward P. Bromley IIIReed Smith | Feb 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.33 | 1.55 | 1.46 |