ING GROEP NV ING (last ticker on record)
CIK 1039765Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linklaters LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| King & Spalding | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Evan S. SimpsonSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alexander G. SimpsonKing & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen M. KotranSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Connie MilonakisDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evan S. SimpsonSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alexander G. SimpsonKing & Spalding | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen M. KotranSullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| Connie MilonakisDavis Polk | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |