CHINA EXPERT TECHNOLOGY, INC. CXTI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1039726Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Frascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C.First linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Fennemore CraigFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Frascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C. | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.38 | 1.47 | 0.91 |
| Fennemore Craig | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 99 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gary S. JoinerFrascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C.First linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Charles A. ClevelandFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 1.21× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Gary S. JoinerFrascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C. | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.50 | 1.55 | 0.85 |
| Charles A. Cleveland | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.55 | 1.21 | 0.00 |