L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LLL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1039101Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Akin Gump | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Fried Frank | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elizabeth A. CooperSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth A. CooperSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 37 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| John F. Kennedy | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |
| Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 21 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.49 |