RBS Holdings N.V.
CIK 1038727Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- White & CaseFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Gibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.93 |
| White & Case | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Allen & Overy | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.63 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Davis Polk | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.89 |
| Mayer Brown | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.89 |
| Gibson Dunn & Crutcher | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Keith L. KearneyCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Richard A. DruckerDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- MARTIN H. NEIDELLStroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Edward S. BestMayer BrownFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Steven R. FinleyGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith L. KearneyCahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 113 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Richard A. DruckerDavis Polk | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.15 | 0.89 | 0.47 |
| MARTIN H. NEIDELLStroock & Stroock & Lavan | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Edward S. BestMayer Brown | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Steven R. FinleyGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.10 |