BRAZILIAN DISTRIBUTION CO COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE DISTR CBD CBDBY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1038572Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | Jan 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew B. JánszkyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Andrew B. JanszkyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- John GuzmanWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 2018 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew B. JánszkyShearman & Sterling | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| Andrew B. JanszkyShearman & Sterling | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| John GuzmanWhite & Case | Jan 2018 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |