METALS USA INC MUSA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1038363Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kennedy Covington Lobdell & HickmanFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Robinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 133 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | May 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Bracewell LLP | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Husch Blackwell | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 53 | 1.04 | 0.38 | 1.29 |
| Robinson & Cole LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 133 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.88 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- J. Vincent KendrickAkin GumpFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- WILLIAM D. GUTERMUTHBracewell LLPFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Richard A. KrantzRobinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Vincent KendrickAkin Gump | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| WILLIAM D. GUTERMUTHBracewell LLP | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Richard A. KrantzRobinson & Cole LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 17 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.19 |