MAC-GRAY CORP TUC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1038280Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2009 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jacqueline MercierGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Joseph L. Johnson IIIGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Robert P. Whalen Jr.Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacqueline MercierGoodwin Procter | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Joseph L. Johnson IIIGoodwin Procter | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Robert P. Whalen Jr.Goodwin Procter | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2009 | Text search only | 28 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.39 |