ORANGE FNCTF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1038143Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2002
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Mar 2000 to Sep 2002
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones DayFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 259 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Day | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 259 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Linda HesseJones DayFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sami ToutounjiShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Robert C. TreuholdShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda HesseJones Day | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sami ToutounjiShearman & Sterling | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Robert C. TreuholdShearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 |