SILICON LABORATORIES INC. SLAB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1038074Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- S. MICHAEL DUNN, P.C.First linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| S. MICHAEL DUNN, P.C. | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Drew M. ValentineDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Philip RussellDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew M. ValentineDLA Piper | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Philip RussellDLA Piper | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.12 |