BXP, Inc. BXP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1037540Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ettore A. SantucciFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Arent FoxFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ettore A. Santucci | Apr 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Arent Fox | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| Shaw Pittman | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Willkie Farr | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Caitlin R. TompkinsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2023 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel P. AdamsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caitlin R. TompkinsGoodwin Procter | May 2023 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Daniel P. AdamsGoodwin Procter | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin Procter | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |