COLLINS & AIKMAN FLOOR COVERINGS INC
CIK 1037123Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Witt Gaither & WhitakerFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 2.46×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2002 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Witt Gaither & Whitaker | May 2002 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.46 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Leslie A. GrandisMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- G. DONALD JOHNSONWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 4.61× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Leslie A. GrandisMcGuireWoods LLP | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| G. DONALD JOHNSONWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 1.73 | 4.61 | 0.00 |
| Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.87 |