NII HOLDINGS INC NIHD (last ticker on record)

CIK 1037016Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Restructuring
Bankruptcy
95% wipeout
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 4; Newest began May 2017
Largest fall in its shares: 98%; Jul 2015 to Dec 2017
Law firms: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Dec 18, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 15, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 20, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 1, 2017Shares down 95% from their high
Jun 22, 2015Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 18, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 15, 2014Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 15, 2014Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 6, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 9, 2013Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 31, 2012Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 7, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 28, 2004Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Williams Mullen	Aug 2003	Named in a filing	113	0.92	0.00	0.67
Maples and Calder	Dec 2002	Named in a filing	1,144	0.95	0.26	0.92
Bingham McCutchen	Nov 2002	Named in a filing	291	0.94	0.38	1.06
Jones Day	Aug 2000	Named in a filing	686	1.25	0.54	1.12
Perkins Coie	Sep 1998	Named in a filing	511	0.93	0.27	0.98
Chadbourne & Parke	May 1997	Named in a filing	110	1.64	0.62	0.87
Hogan Lovells US LLP	Feb 2014	Text search only	487	0.96	0.26	0.85
Shearman & Sterling	Mar 2010	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Emmet Marvin & Martin	Dec 2002	Text search only	199	0.81	0.16	0.85
Mayer Brown	Dec 2002	Text search only	680	0.98	0.34	0.94
McDermott Will & Emery	Dec 2002	Text search only	562	0.97	0.60	1.14
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP	Feb 2001	Text search only	130	0.97	0.59	1.27
Latham & Watkins LLP	Feb 2001	Text search only	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	95% wipeout
Charles W. KempLeClairRyan A Professional Corporation	Jun 2007	Named in a filing	12	0.00	1.29
John M. Oakey IIIWilliams Mullen	Nov 2005	Named in a filing	17	1.56	1.05
William L. PitmanSmith Moore Leatherwood	Sep 2003	Named in a filing	6	1.75	3.82
Robert E. Spicer Jr.Williams Mullen	Aug 2003	Named in a filing	11	1.16	2.08
John R. UtzschneiderBingham McCutchen	Nov 2002	Named in a filing	18	0.45	0.59
Lisa A. StaterJones Day	Aug 2000	Named in a filing	11	2.42	3.65
J. Sue MorganPerkins Coie	Sep 1998	Named in a filing	23	1.16	0.48
Dennis J. FriedmanGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	May 1997	Named in a filing	17	0.83	0.83