INTEST CORP INTT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1036262Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Aug 2004 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Harter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Nov 2020 · Named in a filing · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Saul EwingFirst linked May 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harter Secrest & Emery LLP | May 2023 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.35 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Nov 2020 | Named in a filing | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Ballard Spahr | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Saul Ewing | May 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexander R. McCleanHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- C. Christopher MurilloHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander R. McCleanHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Aug 2023 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| C. Christopher MurilloHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Aug 2023 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.37 |