VAIL BANKS INC VAIL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1035770Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Perry-Smith LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
| Perry-Smith LLP | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 32 | 0.66 | 0.42 | 0.50 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lawrence S. MakowWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- W. Randy EaddyKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jan M. DavidsonKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence S. MakowWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 45 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| W. Randy EaddyKilpatrick Stockton | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jan M. DavidsonKilpatrick Stockton | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 1.46 |