CARDINAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC CDCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1035398Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Law Offices of Michael L. CorriganFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.59× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- NEWLAN & NEWLANFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.83× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law Offices of Michael L. Corrigan | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.16 | 2.59 | 0.00 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| K&L Gates | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| NEWLAN & NEWLAN | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 3.83 | 0.00 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Eric NewlanNEWLAN LAW FIRM, PLLCFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Eric NewlanNEWLAN LAW FIRM, PLLC | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.56 | 1.62 | 0.39 |