Eloxx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ELOX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1035354Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2018 to Dec 2023
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2018 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jun 2026 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jan 2024 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Norris McLaughlin & MarcusFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Proskauer Rose | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Cooley LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jan 2018 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Morgan Lewis | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Perkins Coie | Jun 2026 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jan 2024 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
| Norris McLaughlin & Marcus | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 19 | 1.12 | 0.75 | 1.11 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2002 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. RosenbergLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Jennifer A. YoonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- N. Danny ShulmanHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Ellen SmileyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Daniel FormanProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Robert A. CantoneProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Marc RechtCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Miguel J. VegaCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Carl MarcellinoRopes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2018 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Emilio RagosaMorgan LewisFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- David J. SorinBuchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- John F. CinqueFox Rothschild LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 2.35× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. RosenbergLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Jennifer A. YoonLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| N. Danny ShulmanHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Ellen SmileyLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.55 | 1.08 | 1.36 |
| Daniel FormanProskauer Rose | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Robert A. CantoneProskauer Rose | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Marc RechtCooley LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 1.03 |
| Miguel J. VegaCooley LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Carl MarcellinoRopes & Gray | Jan 2018 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Emilio RagosaMorgan Lewis | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| David J. SorinBuchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.94 | 1.07 | 1.25 |
| John F. CinqueFox Rothschild LLP | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.75 | 2.35 | 1.42 |