ECLIPSYS CORP ECLP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1034088Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Foley Hoag | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| HALE AND DORR | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- SCOTT E. PUESCHELHALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Brent B. SilerCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- John A. BurgessHALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCOTT E. PUESCHELHALE AND DORR | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Brent B. SilerCooley LLP | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 51 | 0.40 | 0.57 | 1.70 |
| John A. BurgessHALE AND DORR | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.80 |