FORCE PROTECTION INC FRPT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1032863Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & RenshawFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Trombly Business Law, PCFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & Renshaw | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.78 | 1.71 | 1.30 |
| Trombly Business Law, PC | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.22 | 1.30 | 0.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric M. KrautheimerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert W. DownesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- John J. Concannon IIIBingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Amy M. TromblyTrombly Business Law, PCFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Brian F. FaulknerFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.63× · Went dark 2.42× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric M. KrautheimerSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert W. DownesSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.62 | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| John J. Concannon IIIBingham McCutchen | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Amy M. TromblyTrombly Business Law, PC | Jan 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.43 | 1.13 | 0.39 |
| Brian F. Faulkner | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.63 | 2.42 | 0.42 |