LAND O LAKES INC
CIK 1032562Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Spencer FaneFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Jones DayFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Lindquist & VennumFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 101 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre & Benson | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Spencer Fane | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Jones Day | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Lindquist & Vennum | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 101 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 1.22 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David B. MillerFaegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael K. CoddingtonFaegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- PHILIP S. GARONFaegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David B. MillerFaegre & Benson | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael K. CoddingtonFaegre & Benson | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| PHILIP S. GARONFaegre & Benson | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 9 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.73 |