SEMPRA SRE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1032208Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Richards Layton & FingersFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 9.72× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Mayer Brown | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 117 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.16 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Brown & Wood | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Richards Layton & Fingers | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 7 | 1.23 | 9.72 | 0.00 |
| Sidley Austin | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew WeisbergWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Barry M. ClarksonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 2.45× · 95% wipeout 3.04×
- David R. SnyderPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 2.96× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- DAVID W. HELENIAKShearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 3.60× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul C. PringleSidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.64× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew WeisbergWhite & Case | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 44 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.57 | 1.12 | 0.64 |
| Barry M. ClarksonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.26 | 2.45 | 3.04 |
| David R. SnyderPillsbury Winthrop | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.92 | 2.96 | 0.59 |
| DAVID W. HELENIAKShearman & Sterling | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.26 | 3.60 | 0.00 |
| Paul C. PringleSidley Austin | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 12 | 1.69 | 2.64 | 0.00 |