FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP FSP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1031316Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Holland & Knight | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 413 | 1.16 | 0.82 | 1.21 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas S. WardHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 3.46× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas S. WardHALE AND DORR | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.47 | 3.46 | 1.49 |
| Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.80 |