ENTRUST INC ENTU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1031283Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John EvangelakosSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 2.37× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- John A. BurgessHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John EvangelakosSullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.95 | 2.37 | 0.00 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.39 |
| James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| John A. BurgessHALE AND DORR | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.75 |