EVERCOM INC
CIK 1030965Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Hughes & LuceFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Hughes & Luce | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.25 | 0.58 | 2.09 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2005 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Paul Hastings | May 2005 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JEFFREY M. OSHINSKYGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- JORGE L. FREELANDWhite & CaseFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- Glen J. HettingerFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.41×
- Stephen M. BankerSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEFFREY M. OSHINSKYGreenberg Traurig | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| JORGE L. FREELANDWhite & Case | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.84 | 1.35 | 2.30 |
| Glen J. HettingerFulbright & Jaworski | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.41 |
| Stephen M. BankerSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 1.31 | 0.83 |
| William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & Moore | May 2005 | Text search only | 51 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.52 |