TRC COMPANIES INC TRR (last ticker on record)
CIK 103096Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
| Paul Hastings | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David B. FeirsteinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joshua KoganKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Michael GrundeiWiggin and DanaFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Esteban A. FerrerPaul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David B. FeirsteinKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joshua KoganKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Michael GrundeiWiggin and Dana | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Esteban A. FerrerPaul Hastings | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 1.61 | 0.82 |