UTSTARCOM HOLDINGS CORP. UTSI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1030471Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Sep 2014 to May 2022
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Maples and Calder | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Meng DingSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Steve LinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Valerie BarnettWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- James B. BucherShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- NORA L. GIBSONBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Steven E. BochnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- STEVEN L. BERSONWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
- John L. SavvaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meng DingSidley Austin | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Steve LinKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 63 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| Valerie BarnettWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| James B. BucherShearman & Sterling | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| NORA L. GIBSONBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Steven E. BochnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 63 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| STEVEN L. BERSONWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 2.33 |
| John L. SavvaSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 28 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.12 |