LIFESTREAM TECHNOLOGIES INC LFTC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1029738Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Foster PepperFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Roxanne K. BeillyFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 2.14× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Steven I. WeinbergerFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider Weinberger LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.59 | 2.20 | 1.44 |
| Foster Pepper | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 1.92 |
| Roxanne K. Beilly | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 44 | 1.21 | 2.14 | 1.45 |
| Steven I. Weinberger | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 49 | 1.10 | 1.85 | 1.51 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven I. WeinbergerSchneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Craig H. NorvilleFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 2.76× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Patrick J. SheehanFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.01× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven I. WeinbergerSchneider Weinberger LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.33 | 1.75 | 1.32 |
| Craig H. Norville | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 0.73 | 2.76 | 1.05 |
| Patrick J. Sheehan | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 8 | 1.19 | 2.01 | 1.69 |