Modsys International Ltd MDSYF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1029581Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Herzog Fox & NeemanFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Frankel LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Herzog Fox & Neeman | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Frankel LLP | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan HambeltonCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Marc RechtCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Stephane LevyCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Ernest S. WechslerKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Richard H. GildenKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan HambeltonCooley LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
| Marc RechtCooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 1.03 |
| Stephane LevyCooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Ernest S. WechslerKramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.37 | 1.09 | 1.01 |
| Richard H. GildenKramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.56 |