Golden Ocean Group Ltd GOGL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1029145Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- May 2008 to Feb 2016
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- MELLO JONES & MARTINFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MELLO JONES & MARTIN | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Seward & Kissel | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Keith BillottiSeward & KisselFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Robert E. LustrinSeward & KisselFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 3.08×
- Gary J. WolfeSeward & KisselFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.65×
- Anthony Tu-SekineSeward & KisselFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Evan PreponisSeward & KisselFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Edward S. HortonSeward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Kate BlankenshipSeward & KisselFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith BillottiSeward & Kissel | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Robert E. LustrinSeward & Kissel | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.29 | 0.55 | 3.08 |
| Gary J. WolfeSeward & Kissel | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 2.65 |
| Anthony Tu-SekineSeward & Kissel | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 13 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Evan PreponisSeward & Kissel | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 10 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Edward S. HortonSeward & Kissel | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 39 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Kate BlankenshipSeward & Kissel | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 8 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.06 |