ALARIS MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
CIK 1029069Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- WEITZEN SHALOV & WEINFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 2.62× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.80 |
| WEITZEN SHALOV & WEIN | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman LLP | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 34 | 1.40 | 2.62 | 1.25 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.06 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- GORDON ALTMAN BUTOWSKYWEITZEN SHALOV & WEINFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel J. ZubkoffCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.70× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA Piper | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| GORDON ALTMAN BUTOWSKYWEITZEN SHALOV & WEIN | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel J. ZubkoffCahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 1.38 | 1.70 | 0.54 |