COBIZ FINANCIAL INC COBZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1028734Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Dec 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Reed & ReedFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Dec 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Arnold & Porter | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Reed & Reed | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 0.43 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey R. KesselmanSherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- ANDREW L. BLAIR JR.Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey R. KesselmanSherman & Howard L.L.C. | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ANDREW L. BLAIR JR.Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |