FIDELITY BANKSHARES INC FFFL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1028336Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Luse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
- Werner & BlankFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 70 | 0.49 | 1.01 | 1.37 |
| Luse Gorman, PC | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.21 |
| Werner & Blank | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 19 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Nixon Peabody | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas C. BlankShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven LanterLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan SchickLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Eric LuseLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.24×
- Beverly J. WhiteLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Elizabeth A. CookLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Raymond J. GustiniNixon PeabodyFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas C. BlankShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven LanterLuse Gorman, PC | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alan SchickLuse Gorman, PC | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Eric LuseLuse Gorman, PC | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 67 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| Beverly J. WhiteLuse Gorman, PC | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Elizabeth A. CookLuse Gorman, PC | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 12 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Raymond J. GustiniNixon Peabody | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 6 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |