BIOENVISION INC BIVN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1028205Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Paul Hastings | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher J. DennGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- James R. KasingerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. Mark PoerioHousley Kantarian & Bronstein, P.C.First linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Luke P. Iovine IIIPaul HastingsFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.45×
- ANDREW J. COSENTINOPiper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.24× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher J. DennGoodwin Procter | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| James R. KasingerGoodwin Procter | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. Mark PoerioHousley Kantarian & Bronstein, P.C. | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Luke P. Iovine IIIPaul Hastings | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.45 |
| ANDREW J. COSENTINOPiper & Marbury L.L.P. | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.24 | 2.08 | 0.00 |