HEALTH GRADES INC HGRD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1027915Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Faegre & Benson | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Morgan Lewis | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason DayPerkins CoieFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Peter D. LyonsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Douglas R. WrightFaegre & BensonFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Alan SingerMorgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Michael MovsovichKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason DayPerkins Coie | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.53 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| Peter D. LyonsShearman & Sterling | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Douglas R. WrightFaegre & Benson | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.75 | 1.55 | 1.17 |
| Alan SingerMorgan Lewis | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Michael MovsovichKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 16 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.71 |