THANE INTERNATIONAL INC THAN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1027882Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Best Best & KriegerFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Hall Dickler Kent Goldstein & Wood LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Best Best & Krieger | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Hall Dickler Kent Goldstein & Wood LLP | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.92 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JEFFREY M. OSHINSKYGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- JORGE L. FREELANDWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
- David A. StocktonKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEFFREY M. OSHINSKYGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| JORGE L. FREELANDWhite & Case | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.84 | 1.35 | 2.08 |
| David A. StocktonKilpatrick Stockton | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 19 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.29 |