EPIQ SYSTEMS INC EPIQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1027207Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Gilmore & Bell, P.C.First linked May 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.First linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Bryan Cave | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Gilmore & Bell, P.C. | May 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 154 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James W. AllenStinson Leonard Street LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Mark T. HiraideMitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.09× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James W. AllenStinson Leonard Street LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Mark T. HiraideMitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 7 | 3.09 | 1.92 | 1.72 |