CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC CMT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1026655Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jun 2015 to Apr 2020
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 147 | 1.13 | 0.16 | 0.99 |
| Brown & Wood | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Patton Boggs | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Aaron A. SeamonSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- EDWARD J. FINESidley AustinFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 4.04× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron A. SeamonSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| EDWARD J. FINESidley Austin | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.19 | 4.04 | 1.12 |