CHEMFIRST INC
CIK 1026601Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Butler SnowFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.15 |
| Ballard Spahr | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Butler Snow | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 22 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carol D. GoldFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Charles W. Mulaney Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Anna T. PinedoMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- James R. TanenbaumMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carol D. Gold | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Charles W. Mulaney Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Anna T. PinedoMorrison & Foerster | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 51 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| James R. TanenbaumMorrison & Foerster | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 46 | 1.41 | 1.54 | 1.14 |