STAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC STRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1026486Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 1999 to Mar 2001
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Riordan & McKinzieFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riordan & McKinzie | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.74 | 1.13 | 1.13 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.28 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- CYNTHIA M. DUNNETTRiordan & McKinzieFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 2.14× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Anthony J. McCuskerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- ANTHONY M. ALLENGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 2.73×
- CARLA S. NEWELLGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.62× · 95% wipeout 3.18×
- Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 3.35× · 95% wipeout 2.79×
- John EvangelakosSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 2.37× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYNTHIA M. DUNNETTRiordan & McKinzie | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.27 | 2.14 | 0.48 |
| Anthony J. McCuskerGoodwin Procter | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 0.71 |
| ANTHONY M. ALLENGunderson Dettmer | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.45 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| CARLA S. NEWELLGunderson Dettmer | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 3.18 |
| Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin Procter | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.41 | 3.35 | 2.79 |
| John EvangelakosSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 15 | 0.95 | 2.37 | 0.00 |