IMPAC MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC IMPC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1026448Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan TalkingtonOrrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brett CooperOrrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 2.35× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Steven M. PeckWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan TalkingtonOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.54 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| Brett CooperOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.84 | 2.35 | 1.05 |
| Steven M. PeckWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |